<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>kriticle.com</title>
	
	<link>http://www.kriticle.com</link>
	<description />
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/kriticle" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>Invasion (2007)</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/kriticle/~3/254649398/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kriticle.com/kritics/the-mad-critic/invasion-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Mad Critic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Mad Critic]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>invasion</category>
	<category>dr</category>
	<category>robin</category>
	<category>cook</category>
	<category>note</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>number</category>
	<category>invasion</category>
	<category>dr</category>
	<category>robin</category>
	<category>cook</category>
	<category>vomit</category>
	<category>vomit</category>
	<category>nicole</category>
	<category>kidman</category>
	<category>and</category>
	<category>totally</category>
	<category>different</category>
	<category>vomit</category>
	<category>spewing</category>
	<category>infected     but</category>
	<category>invasion</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>body</category>
	<category>snatchers</category>
	<category>abruptly</category>
	<category>silly</category>
	<category>suddenly</category>
	<category>a</category>
	<category>cure</category>
	<category>modern</category>
	<category>modern</category>
	<category>medicine</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kriticle.com/kritics/the-mad-critic/invasion-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before you read this review on The Invasion, read my review on Invasion by Dr. Robin Cook.  Note the number of stars that Dr. Cook&#8217;s book received.  Then come back here and take a guess what this movie will receive.
&#8220;But!&#8221; you may argue, &#8220;this is a movie with Nicole Kidman!  And totally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you read this review on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00005JPUN?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=kriticle-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B00005JPUN">The Invasion</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=kriticle-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B00005JPUN" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important" border="0" height="1" width="1" />, read <a href="http://www.kriticle.com/kritics/the-mad-critic/invasion-by-dr-robin-cook/">my review</a> on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0425219577?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=kriticle-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0425219577">Invasion by Dr. Robin Cook</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=kriticle-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0425219577" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important" border="0" height="1" width="1" />.  Note the number of stars that Dr. Cook&#8217;s book received.  Then come back here and take a guess what this movie will receive.</p>
<p>&#8220;But!&#8221; you may argue, &#8220;this is a movie with Nicole Kidman!  And totally different.&#8221;  Poppycock, I say.<div id="adsense"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-9271180217410872";
/* Kriticle In-Post */
google_ad_slot = "1155141742";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div></p>
<p>This, like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0425219577?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=kriticle-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0425219577">Invasion</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=kriticle-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0425219577" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important" border="0" height="1" width="1" />, was a bad adaptation of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0782009980?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=kriticle-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0782009980">Invasion of the Body Snatchers</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=kriticle-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0782009980" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important" border="0" height="1" width="1" />, which in its time was an outstanding shock sci-fi film.  Trying to make it more modern, whether you use modern medicine or Nicole Kidman, is an exercise in futility.</p>
<p>The movie also gets the &#8220;yuck&#8221; factor going, with the preferred method of passing the alien lifeform from host to host being vomit.  Yes, vomit.  In drinks, in many cases.</p>
<p>There were some interesting points, such as the scene with the person falling from the roof.  Those who cried out were seen as normal humans.  Those who showed no emotions were obviously part of the hive of vomit spewing infected.</p>
<p>But, just like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0425219577?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=kriticle-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0425219577">Invasion by Dr. Robin Cook</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=kriticle-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0425219577" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important" border="0" height="1" width="1" />, the movie ends so abruptly it&#8217;s silly.  Suddenly a cure is found, it&#8217;s spread all over by the world, and everyone smiles and forgets about the dead in the streets, the vomit they drank, etc.</p>
<p>Fin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kriticle.com/kritics/the-mad-critic/invasion-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.kriticle.com/kritics/the-mad-critic/invasion-2007/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton’s Personal Finances - 404 Not Found</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/kriticle/~3/246908881/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillary-clintons-personal-finances-404-not-found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Kriticle</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics 2008]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>love</category>
	<category>errors</category>
	<category>mirror</category>
	<category>real</category>
	<category>life</category>
	<category>issues     for</category>
	<category>instance</category>
	<category>released</category>
	<category>2007</category>
	<category>tax</category>
	<category>returns</category>
	<category>and</category>
	<category>refuses</category>
	<category>browsing</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>monetary</category>
	<category>contributions</category>
	<category>a</category>
	<category>personal</category>
	<category>finances</category>
	<category />
	<category>wondered</category>
	<category>clicking</category>
	<category>opensecrets org</category>
	<category>decided</category>
	<category>kind</category>
	<category>data</category>
	<category>hillary</category>
	<category>clinton</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillary-clintons-personal-finances-404-not-found/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to love when web errors mirror real life issues.
For instance, when browsing the monetary contributions to Hillary Clinton&#8217;s 2008 campaign on opensecrets.org, I decided to have a look at her Personal Finances.  I wondered, before clicking, what kind of data they would find, since Hillary Clinton has not released her 2007 tax [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to love when web errors mirror real life issues.</p>
<p>For instance, when browsing the <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summary.asp?id=N00000019&amp;cycle=2008">monetary contributions to Hillary Clinton&#8217;s 2008 campaign</a> on <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org">opensecrets.org</a>, I decided to have a look at her Personal Finances.  I wondered, before clicking, what kind of data they would find, since <a href="http://thepage.time.com/obama-memo-on-clinton-tax-returns/">Hillary Clinton has not released her 2007 tax returns</a> and refuses to divulge much information on her political state.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s a story for the mainstream media to cover.  Instead, let&#8217;s go to Hillary Clinton&#8217;s Personal Finances page&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/open_secrets1.jpg" title="Open Secrets - About to Click!"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/open_secrets1.jpg" title="Open Secrets - About to Click!"><img src="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/open_secrets1.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Open Secrets - About to Click!" /></a></p>
<p>And we click the mouse&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/open_secrets2.jpg" title="404 Not Found"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/open_secrets2.jpg" title="404 Not Found"><img src="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/open_secrets2.thumbnail.jpg" alt="404 Not Found" /></a></p>
<p>I have never seen a more fitting 404 error.</p>
<p>Just as a note, this does happen for the other candidates too, but the first I tried was Hillary, and it is definitely more fitting for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillary-clintons-personal-finances-404-not-found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillary-clintons-personal-finances-404-not-found/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary’s Dying Campaign Placed on Life Support</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/kriticle/~3/245958902/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillarys-dying-campaign-placed-on-life-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 08:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Kriticle</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics 2008]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>republican</category>
	<category>endorsement</category>
	<category>speeches</category>
	<category>fierce</category>
	<category>barrage</category>
	<category>paint</category>
	<category>black</category>
	<category>ads</category>
	<category>fear</category>
	<category>ads</category>
	<category>hillary</category>
	<category>clinton</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillarys-dying-campaign-not-euthanized-placed-on-life-support/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that Hillary Clinton&#8217;s fierce barrage of fear ads, paint it black ads, Republican endorsement speeches, and &#8220;as far as I know&#8221; statements were enough to win her the desperation/middle-of-nowhere vote in Rhode Island, Ohio, and Texas, placing her campaign on life support.  Fierce attempts by the media and the Clinton Campaign to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Hillary Clinton&#8217;s fierce barrage of <a href="http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillary-clintons-scare-tactics/">fear ads</a>, <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/4/21311/85811/447/468408">paint it black ads</a>, <a href="http://www.kriticle.com/politics/here-we-go-hillary-clinton-unleashed/">Republican endorsement speeches</a>, and <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/clinton-says-ob.html">&#8220;as far as I know&#8221; statements</a> were enough to win her the desperation/middle-of-nowhere vote in Rhode Island, Ohio, and Texas, placing her campaign on life support.  Fierce attempts by the media and the Clinton Campaign to find even the slightest glimmer of scandal the day before the primaries also seems to have helped her; exit polls showed that 61% of the voters who chose in the last three days (how&#8217;s that for political conviction?) chose Hillary.  However, three states with slim margins does not a &#8220;comeback kid&#8221; claim make.</p>
<p>Additionally, her delegate count has barely changed, and <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/118240">the math suggests</a> that she is at this point too far behind in the polls to do well without political maneuvering of the DNC.</p>
<p>This pushes the primaries out again, now to Pennsylvania, where Hillary Clinton hopes to win the vote that the governor of Pennsylvania (Ed Rendell) <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/philly-blunt-pa.html">acknowledges will probably be prejudiced against a black candidate</a>.</p>
<p>But hey, it&#8217;s all about the votes, right?</p>
<p>Meanwhile, <a href="http://blog.pmarca.com/2008/03/an-hour-and-a-h.html">here are some solid reasons to vote for Barack Obama</a> from  Marc Andreessen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillarys-dying-campaign-placed-on-life-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillarys-dying-campaign-placed-on-life-support/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>SHOCKER:  Hillary Clinton Puts Press in the Toilet</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/kriticle/~3/245623718/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/shocker-hillary-clinton-puts-press-in-the-toilet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Kriticle</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics 2008]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>senator</category>
	<category>hillary</category>
	<category>clinton</category>
	<category>arranged</category>
	<category>special</category>
	<category>accommodations</category>
	<category>bathroom     images</category>
	<category>coming</category>
	<category>order</category>
	<category>reporters</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>past</category>
	<category>couple</category>
	<category>days</category>
	<category>press</category>
	<category>corps     the</category>
	<category>men</category>
	<category>bias</category>
	<category>campaign</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kriticle.com/politics/shocker-hillary-clinton-puts-press-in-the-toilet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to thank reporters for their bias towards her campaign over the past couple days, Senator Hillary Clinton arranged special accommodations for her press corps.
The men&#8217;s bathroom.
Information is coming in this morning from the CNN Political Ticker and Time showing reporters set up and typing away in the restroom.  Personally, I would say [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to thank reporters for <a href="http://www.kriticle.com/politics/here-we-go-hillary-clinton-unleashed/">their bias towards her campaign</a> over the past couple days, Senator Hillary Clinton arranged special accommodations for her press corps.</p>
<p>The men&#8217;s bathroom.</p>
<p>Information is coming in this morning from the <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/03/scenes-from-the-trail-a-creative-filing-center/">CNN Political Ticker</a> and <a href="http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/03/luxury_living_on_the_campaign.html">Time</a> showing reporters set up and typing away in the restroom.  Personally, I would say that this shows the way Hillary treats the press and ultimately will treat the American people; however, the Clinton campaign has returned this comment from Doug Hattaway:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;These accommodations should in no way be taken as a commentary on the quality of our media coverage.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Are you sure?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/clinton_bathroom.jpg" title="Luxury Media Treatment"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/clinton_bathroom.jpg" title="Luxury Media Treatment"><img src="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/clinton_bathroom.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Luxury Media Treatment" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><font color="#999999">(Photo Credit: Sasha Johnson/<a href="http://www.cnn.com">CNN</a>)</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/shocker-hillary-clinton-puts-press-in-the-toilet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/shocker-hillary-clinton-puts-press-in-the-toilet/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Here We Go - Hillary Clinton Unleashed</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/kriticle/~3/245548088/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/here-we-go-hillary-clinton-unleashed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Kriticle</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics 2008]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>clinton</category>
	<category>endorse</category>
	<category>barack</category>
	<category>obama     hillary</category>
	<category>clinton</category>
	<category>supporter</category>
	<category>calls</category>
	<category>obama</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>canadian</category>
	<category>thing</category>
	<category>supposedly</category>
	<category>a</category>
	<category>high</category>
	<category>ranking</category>
	<category>obama</category>
	<category>official</category>
	<category>spoke</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>news     hillary</category>
	<category>clinton</category>
	<category>endorses</category>
	<category>john</category>
	<category>mccain</category>
	<category>a</category>
	<category>muslim     mainstream</category>
	<category>media</category>
	<category />
	<category>crusaders</category>
	<category>a</category>
	<category>democratic</category>
	<category>hopeful</category>
	<category>praising</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>competing</category>
	<category>party</category>
	<category>struggle</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>mainstream</category>
	<category>media</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>canadian</category>
	<category>government</category>
	<category>refutes</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>claims</category>
	<category>2</category>
	<category>experience</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>white</category>
	<category>house</category>
	<category>and</category>
	<category>senator</category>
	<category>obama</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kriticle.com/politics/here-we-go-hillary-clinton-unleashed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past day or two has been very tight, with a huge uncertainty looming in Texas and especially in Ohio.  However, the thing of which everyone was most certain was that we&#8217;d be seeing a last struggle by Hillary Clinton before she threw in the hat.
Some of us also speculated that we&#8217;d be seeing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The past day or two has been very tight, with a huge uncertainty looming in Texas and especially in Ohio.  However, the thing of which everyone was most certain was that we&#8217;d be seeing a last struggle by Hillary Clinton before she threw in the hat.</p>
<p>Some of us also speculated that we&#8217;d be seeing a last struggle by the mainstream media; a fight to keep the democratic race alive.  There is nothing the media would like better than a fight all the way to convention, with back room deals in the smoke filled halls, so to speak, as it would give tons of coverage and keep all those reporters and pundits busy.  And so the proverbial call, it seems, has come from on high.  &#8220;Keep the race going,&#8221; the call says.  &#8220;Keep the ratings up.&#8221;  And so it begins.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton is on a multi-pronged attack.  Her supporters have kicked it up.  The great beast has been awakened, so to speak, that rough beast whose hour has come &#8217;round at last, slouching towards Washington to be born (thank you <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0684807319?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=kriticle-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0684807319">W.B. Yeats</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=kriticle-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0684807319" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important" border="0" height="1" width="1" />).</p>
<p>And so, with poetry failing to press the point, we have the news.</p>
<p><strong>Hillary Clinton Endorses John McCain over Obama</strong></p>
<p>It seems that in this primary it is smears, not tears, upon which Clinton places her hopes.  This one is disturbing for the Democratic Party in general, but not disturbing enough for Howard Dean to pull the plug.  Hillary Clinton said in a statement yesterday that &#8220;I think I have a lifetime of experience that I will bring to the White House.  I know Senator McCain has a lifetime of experience to the White House.  And Senator Obama has a speech he gave in 2002.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><center><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ou4JnWQsxKw"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ou4JnWQsxKw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object></center></p></blockquote>
<p>Wait&#8230;was that an endorsement for John McCain?  Nothing could possibly be more damaging to the Democratic Party than a democratic hopeful praising the competing party OVER a competing candidate of the same party.  Barack Obama has many experience points he will draw upon in the general election if nominated, and for Hillary Clinton to give a statement like this just adds fuel to the Republican attack machine once it is put into play.</p>
<p>This is phase one of Hillary&#8217;s special brand of fight on the eve of the March 4th primaries.  People close to Hillary&#8217;s campaign call it the &#8220;victimized fighter&#8221; tactic.  Those of us who have grasped the bigger picture call it a &#8220;rat in a cage&#8221; tactic.  She is <em>trying </em>to bring out more comparison&#8217;s between herself and John McCain, and push Obama out of the picture.  With this statement, she hopes to show herself as McCain&#8217;s democratic equivalent: a P.O.W. of the political machine, tortured and victimized, but still kicking and ready for action.  And the ongoing damage of her time as a Political P.O.W. is&#8230;<a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/03/clinton-i-have.html">wrinkles</a>.  According to Hillary, she&#8217;s earned every one.</p>
<p>However, I am thankful that Bill Clinton <a href="http://www.kriticle.com/politics/update-hillary-clintons-scare-tactics/">seems to endorse Barack Obama</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Hillary Clinton Supporter Calls Obama &#8220;Osama bin Laden&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>I was wondering when <a href="http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blog/2008/03/did_i_say_osama_i_meant_obama.html">something like this</a> would hit the news or blogosphere.  A woman calling for Hillary Clinton reportedly called a man in a Cleveland suburb, and said:</p>
<p>&#8220;And we haven&#8217;t heard anything that specific from Osama bin Laden.&#8221;</p>
<p>When rebuked on the comment, she added &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry&#8230;just a slip of the tongue.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know, this is just one report of one call.  And we have no way to know if this particular instance is true or not.  But can any of us truly believe that this isn&#8217;t happening?  With all the media attention revolving around the emphasis on Barack Obama&#8217;s middle name, his clothing in Somalia, and Hillary Clinton saying she doesn&#8217;t think Obama is a Muslim, as far as she knows, there must be some calls out there being made to undecided voters that state that Obama is a Muslim, or emphasizing his middle name, or comparing him to Osama bin Laden.  And you know what?  These attacks are ridiculous.</p>
<p><em>Because they encourage a call for national racism.</em>  It&#8217;s not the middle name that&#8217;s a problem.  There is nothing wrong with a candidate having an Arabic middle name.  The problem is the emphasis that is placed upon it, the implied observation that we should all think in terms of race and worry about his middle name.  It goes against everything this country stands for.</p>
<p>How about that for a poll, mainstream media?  Let&#8217;s see an online poll asking if the voters have received calls from Hillary Clinton or John McCain supporters that falsely suggest Obama is a Muslim?</p>
<p><strong>Mainstream Media - Crusaders for Clinton</strong></p>
<p>And if you&#8217;ve been shaking your head this whole time thinking that, &#8220;no, the media is fair in our country,&#8221; let&#8217;s talk about Hillary&#8217;s support over the last day of Hillary Clinton.  Despite her <a href="http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillary-clinton-chooses-money-over-integrity/">recent acceptance of money</a> from International Profit Associates, a company that allegedly has 103 open sexual harassment/assault cases against it, the news is today hammering on the glimpse of a chance that Barack Obama had any dealings with Tony Rezko.  They are conveniently letting it be forgotten that Hillary too had dealings with Rezko.  Old news has been stored and saved, waiting for this day to come to spit it right back out in an obvious engame smear attempt against Barack Obama.  Hillary has played a Hail Mary with her &#8220;wait for Texas and Ohio&#8221; tactic, and she is, of course, trying like hell to make sure it succeeds.  Only tonight will tell on that one.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the Canadian thing.  Supposedly a high ranking Obama official spoke with the Canadian government and said that Canada shouldn&#8217;t worry about Obama&#8217;s NAFTA comments; that they should be taken politically.  Two points on this.  1) <a href="http://www.forbes.com/reuters/feeds/reuters/2008/03/03/2008-03-04T000047Z_01_N03391783_RTRIDST_0_CANADA-OBAMA-UPDATE-1.html">The Canadian government refutes the claims</a>.  2) So what if he did?  It would only go to show that Barack Obama knows how to ease tensions with foreign nations when the political will in America does not work in the best interest of that foreign nation.  If I was speaking about tearing down and rebuilding a trade agreement with a nation who prospers due to that trade agreement, you&#8217;re damn right I would assure them that I will make sure it works out in the end for everyone.  Chalk this one up as a non-issue, and a late game cheapshot for Clinton&#8217;s campaign.</p>
<p>All this time the Clinton campaign has been grasping at straws, searching for something to make them more viable, to get back a lead, any lead, against Barack Obama after 11 straight losses, to get that <a href="http://www.kriticle.com/politics/barack-obama-swipes-hillarys-inevitability/">sense of inevitability back</a>.  However, the one thing she felt she missed was the endorsement of the mainstream media when making these claims.  And finally, the day before a telling primary, she has it.  I cannot decide if the media is now supporting her because 1) they feel like fools after SNL&#8217;s mockery of the media process with Barack Obama, 2) they feel bad for her after she whined to Tim Russert that she always has to go first, and 3) because they don&#8217;t want their ratings to drop if this doesn&#8217;t go to convention.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe the media is in support of Clinton this morning?  Check out this screenshot of the CNN Politics page.  Where is Barack Obama on the top navigation bar?  Why isn&#8217;t he in a front page picture, standing proud?</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/cnn_clinton_news.jpg" title="CNN - The Clinton News Network"><img src="http://www.kriticle.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/cnn_clinton_news.thumbnail.jpg" alt="CNN - The Clinton News Network" /></a></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/here-we-go-hillary-clinton-unleashed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/here-we-go-hillary-clinton-unleashed/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Political Wisdom of O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000)</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/kriticle/~3/244939240/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/the-political-wisdom-of-o-brother-where-art-thou-2000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Mad Critic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Mad Critic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics 2008]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>pappy</category>
	<category>staff</category>
	<category>1</category>
	<category>howard</category>
	<category>wolfson</category>
	<category>pappy</category>
	<category>staff</category>
	<category>howard</category>
	<category>wolfson</category>
	<category>pappy</category>
	<category>staff</category>
	<category>2</category>
	<category>mark</category>
	<category>penn</category>
	<category>pappy</category>
	<category>staff</category>
	<category>1</category>
	<category>mark</category>
	<category>penn</category>
	<category>pappy</category>
	<category>daniel</category>
	<category>hillary</category>
	<category>clinton</category>
	<category>pappy</category>
	<category>daniel</category>
	<category>hillary</category>
	<category>clinton</category>
	<category>staff</category>
	<category>2</category>
	<category>howard</category>
	<category>wolfson</category>
	<category>staff</category>
	<category>howard</category>
	<category>wolfson</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kriticle.com/politics/the-political-wisdom-of-o-brother-where-art-thou-2000/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I was watching O Brother, Where Art Thou? for the umpteenth time (what can I say, it&#8217;s a great movie), I couldn&#8217;t help but notice some resemblance between the campaigns of the movie and the campaigns of the 2008 Democratic primaries.  In the movie, we have incumbent Governor Menelaus &#8216;Pappy&#8217; O&#8217;Daniel (Charles Durning) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I was watching <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00003CXRM?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=kriticle-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B00003CXRM">O Brother, Where Art Thou?</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=kriticle-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B00003CXRM" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important" border="0" height="1" width="1" /> for the umpteenth time (what can I say, it&#8217;s a great movie), I couldn&#8217;t help but notice some resemblance between the campaigns of the movie and the campaigns of the 2008 Democratic primaries.  In the movie, we have incumbent Governor Menelaus &#8216;Pappy&#8217; O&#8217;Daniel (Charles Durning) against Gubernatorial Candidate Homer Stokes (Wayne Duvall), with Pappy being the hardline conservative and Stokes being the &#8220;sweep the state clean&#8221; progressive liberal.</p>
<p>In addition, we&#8217;ve got the three main characters, Ulysses Everett McGill (George Clooney), Pete (John Turturro), and Delmar O&#8217;Donnel (Tim Blake Nelson) as prison escapees, con artists, and adventurers, trying to outrun the devil, make some money, and seek a non-existent treasure.</p>
<p>In the midst of all this, we have some mighty fine quotes, which I&#8217;d like to place here, except I&#8217;ll be striking out names and placing modern political names instead to show you the similarities.</p>
<blockquote><p>
 <strike>Ulysses Everett McGill</strike> <strong>Barack Obama</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well, all right.  If we take off through that bayou&#8230;&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pete</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Wait a minute.  Who elected you leader of this outfit?&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Everett</strike> <strong>Barack Obama</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well, <strike>Pete</strike> Hillary, I figured it should be the one with the capacity for abstract thought. But if that ain&#8217;t the concensus view, then hell, let&#8217;s put it to a vote.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pete</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Suits me!  I&#8217;m votin&#8217; for yours truly.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Everett</strike> <strong>Barack Obama</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well, I&#8217;m votin&#8217; for yours truly, too.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Delmar</strike> <strong>John Edwards</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Okay, I&#8217;m with you fellas.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> <strike>Lawman</strike> <strong>Wolf Blitzer</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;All right, boys.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Everett</strike> <strong>John Edwards</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Uhh, how&#8217;s my hair?&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> <strike>Pete</strike> <strong>Mitt Romney</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well I&#8217;ll be a sonofabitch. <strike>Delmar&#8217;s</strike> Huckabee&#8217;s been saved.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Delmar</strike> <strong>Mike Huckabee</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well that&#8217;s it, boys. I&#8217;ve been redeemed. The preacher&#8217;s done warshed away all my sins and transgressions. It&#8217;s the straight and narrow from here on out, and heaven everlasting&#8217;s my reward.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Everett</strike> <strong>John McCain</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Delmar, what are you talking about? We&#8217;ve got bigger fish to fry.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Delmar</strike> <strong>Mike Huckabee</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;The preacher said all my sins is warshed away, including that <strike>Piggly Wiggly I knocked over in Yazoo</strike> felon&#8217;s sentence I commuted for donations.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Everett</strike> <strong>John McCain</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;I thought you said you was innocent of those charges?&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Delmar</strike> <strong>Mike Huckabee</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well I was lyin&#8217;. And the preacher said that that sin&#8217;s been warshed away too. Neither God nor man&#8217;s got nothin&#8217; on me now. C&#8217;mon in boys, the water is fine.&#8221;</em>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> <strike>Junior O&#8217;Daniel (Del Pentecost)</strike> <strong>Bill Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well, ain&#8217;t you gonna press the flesh, <strike>Pappy</strike> Hillary?  Do a little politickin&#8217;?&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy O&#8217;Daniel</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;I&#8217;ll press your flesh, you dimwhitted sumbitch. You don&#8217;t tell your <strike>pappy</strike> wife how to court the electorate. We ain&#8217;t one-at-a-timin&#8217; here. We&#8217;re mass communicatin&#8217;!&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> <strike>Delmar</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s right keeping him under wraps like we was ashamed of him.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Everett</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well, <strike>if it is Pete,</strike> I am ashamed of him. The way I see it, he got what he deserved. Fornicating with some whore of Babylon. These things don,t happen for no reason, <strike>Delmar</strike> Howard. It&#8217;s obviously some kind of judgement on <strike>Pete&#8217;s</strike> Bill&#8217;s character.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Delmar</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well, the two of us was fixin&#8217; to fornicate.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strike>Pappy O&#8221;Daniel</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;We need a shot in the arm.  You hear me boys?  In the Goddamn arm!  Election held tomorrow, that son of bitch <strike>Stokes</strike> Obama would win it in a walk!&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Junior O&#8217;Daniel</strike> <strong>Bill Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well&#8217; he&#8217;s the reform candidate, <strike>Daddy</strike> honey.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy O&#8221;Daniel</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Yeah.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Junior O&#8217;Daniel</strike> <strong>Bill Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;A lot of people like that reform.  Maybe we should get us some.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy O&#8221;Daniel</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;I&#8217;ll reform you, you soft-headed son of a bitch. How we gonna run reform when we&#8217;re the damn incumbent? Is that the best idea you boys can come up with? Reform?! Weepin&#8217; jesus on the cross. That&#8217;s it! You may as well start drafting my concession speach right now.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Okay, <strike>Pappy</strike> Hillary.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy O&#8221;Daniel</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;I&#8217;m just making a point you stupid son of a bitch.  Give me back that hat!  Hurry up!&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;<strike>Pappy&#8217;s</strike> Hillary&#8217;s just makin&#8217; a point.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy O&#8221;Daniel</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Shut up!&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strike>Homer Stokes</strike> <strong>Barack Obama</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;The great <strike>state of Mississippi</strike> USA can not afford four more years of <strike>Pappy O&#8217;Daniel</strike> Hillary Clinton. Four more years of cronyism! Nepotism! Rascalism! Of service to the interests!&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 1</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;It&#8217;s a problem of&#8230;&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 2</strike> <strong>Mark Penn</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Perception.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 1</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;That&#8217;s right.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 2</strike> <strong>Mark Penn</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;The reason he&#8217;s pullin&#8217; our pants down.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 1</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Gonna paddle a little behind.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 2</strike> <strong>Mark Penn</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Ain&#8217;t gonna paddle it.  Gonna kick it, real hard.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 1</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;No, I believe he&#8217;s gonna paddle it.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 2</strike> <strong>Mark Penn</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;I don&#8217;t believe that&#8217;s a proper description.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 1</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Well, that&#8217;s how I&#8217;d characterize it.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 2</strike> <strong>Mark Penn</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;I believe it&#8217;s more of a kickin&#8217; situation.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><em><strike>Vernon T. Waldrip</strike> <strong>David Axelrod</strong>: </em><em><span class="quote">&#8220;I can&#8217;t switch sides in the middle of a campaign.  Especially to work for a <strike>man</strike> woman who lacks moral fiber.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy O&#8217;Daniel</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Moral fiber? Why, you little pasty-face sumbitch. I invented moral fiber! <strike>Pappy O&#8217;Daniel</strike> Hillary Clinton was displaying rectitude and high-mindedness when that egghead you work for was still messing his drawers!&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p><strike>Pappy O&#8217;Daniel</strike> <strong>Hillary Clinton</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Yeah, well, you&#8217;ll be laughing out the other side of your face come November.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 2</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;<strike>Pappy O&#8217;Daniel</strike> Hillary Clinton will be laughing then.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 1</strike> <strong>Mark Penn</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Not out the other side of <strike>his</strike> her face, though.&#8221;     </em><br />
<strike>Pappy&#8217;s Staff 2</strike> <strong>Howard Wolfson</strong>: <em><span class="quote">&#8220;Oh, no, no, no.  Just the regular side.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Please note, of course, that none of the above quotes are truly attributed to any real life personages; they are simply a parody on quotes from O Brother Where Art Thou and the perceived actions of people on the campaign trail.  In a nutshell, it&#8217;s satire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/the-political-wisdom-of-o-brother-where-art-thou-2000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/the-political-wisdom-of-o-brother-where-art-thou-2000/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Other Boleyn Girl (2008)</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/kriticle/~3/244362364/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kriticle.com/kritics/the-mad-critic/the-other-boleyn-girl-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Mad Critic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Mad Critic]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>history</category>
	<category>screenwriting     natalie</category>
	<category>portman</category>
	<category>plays</category>
	<category>anne</category>
	<category>boleyn</category>
	<category>mary</category>
	<category>and</category>
	<category>anne</category>
	<category>boleyn</category>
	<category>spent</category>
	<category>showing</category>
	<category>anne</category>
	<category>boleyn</category>
	<category>thought</category>
	<category>anne</category>
	<category>boleyn</category>
	<category>depicting</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>transition</category>
	<category>properly     as</category>
	<category>a</category>
	<category>soap</category>
	<category>opera</category>
	<category>anne</category>
	<category>boleyn</category>
	<category>mary</category>
	<category>boleyn</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>boleyn</category>
	<category>girl</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kriticle.com/kritics/the-mad-critic/the-other-boleyn-girl-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Other Boleyn Girl is an adaptation of the infamous story of Henry VIII (I am, I am), his betrayal of Catherine of Eragon, and love affairs with Mary and Anne Boleyn.  Unfortunately the plot itself is the best part of this movie and that is history, not screenwriting.
Natalie Portman plays Anne Boleyn, an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0012QE4QC?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=kriticle-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B0012QE4QC">The Other Boleyn Girl</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=kriticle-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B0012QE4QC" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important" border="0" height="1" width="1" /> is an adaptation of the infamous story of Henry VIII (I am, I am), his betrayal of Catherine of Eragon, and love affairs with Mary and Anne Boleyn.  Unfortunately the plot itself is the best part of this movie and that is history, not screenwriting.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000204/">Natalie Portman</a> plays Anne Boleyn, an ambitious, catty, and conniving daughter of a desperate man.  Her sister Mary is played by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0424060/">Scarlett Johansson</a>, a more innocent, better looking, and simple woman who unfortunately catches the King&#8217;s (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0051509/">Eric Bana</a>) interest first.  Her highly ambitious family, particularly her father played by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0753314/">Mark Rylance</a> and the Duke of Norfolk played by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0607375/">David Morrissey</a> (quite well actually), decides that she must become mistress to the King and bear him a son in order to lift their family into the good graces of the court.  Unfortunately, Anne Boleyn is not happy about this, is exiled to France, and comes back with loads of knowledge regarding the art of backstabbing.  She finds her sister nearly ready to give birth to Henry&#8217;s heir, and seduces him before the baby arrives.<div id="adsense"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-9271180217410872";
/* Kriticle In-Post */
google_ad_slot = "1155141742";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div></p>
<p>That&#8217;s about a quarter to halfway through the movie.  The rest of the movie is spent showing Anne Boleyn trying to get pregnant,  a family scheming the sexual use of their daughters in such a way that would make <a href="http://www.kriticle.com/category/kritics/womynist/">the Womynist</a> froth at the mouth, and a King who can&#8217;t decide who to get it on with next.  Culminating, of course, in Anne asking her brother to have sex with her after losing the King&#8217;s child and their subsequent beheadings.</p>
<p>In the end I thought that Anne Boleyn got what was coming to her.  I felt bad for Mary Boleyn due to the betrayals of both the King and her sister.  And I felt bad for her brother George (played by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0836343/">Jim Sturgess</a> from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000ZLFALI?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=kriticle-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B000ZLFALI">Across the Universe</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=kriticle-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B000ZLFALI" style="border: medium none  ! important; margin: 0px ! important" border="0" height="1" width="1" />), who stood with his sisters the whole time, was asked to do something unthinkable, did not do it, and still lost his head.  But then, I knew I would feel this way about them because again, this is history.  Somewhat.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll just say it like it is: the movie dragged on.  To me it was more like a soap opera than a movie, and seemed to go from scene to scene without resolving or doing much.  Each scene felt very predictable, and the passage of time was shown rather badly; years go by between some scenes, yet the characters do not develop at all.  Intuition of course tells us that a baby takes months to be born, not minutes, yet the movie makes us feel like it was a one day affair instead of depicting the transition properly.</p>
<p>As a soap opera it was outstanding.  As an epic it falls short tremendously.  As far as historical movies go it was fair, but mostly because the plotline is a no-brainer: sex, lies, beheadings.  How can one go wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kriticle.com/kritics/the-mad-critic/the-other-boleyn-girl-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.kriticle.com/kritics/the-mad-critic/the-other-boleyn-girl-2008/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama Swipes Hillary’s Inevitability</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/kriticle/~3/243947644/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/barack-obama-swipes-hillarys-inevitability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Kriticle</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics 2008]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>article</category>
	<category>highlights</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>largest</category>
	<category>problem</category>
	<category>facing</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>hillary</category>
	<category>clinton</category>
	<category>campaign</category>
	<category />
	<category />
	<category>hillary</category>
	<category>clinton</category>
	<category>announced</category>
	<category>widely</category>
	<category>speculated</category>
	<category>considers</category>
	<category>turn</category>
	<category>win</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>primary</category>
	<category>vote</category>
	<category />
	<category>running</category>
	<category>president</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>candidate</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kriticle.com/politics/barack-obama-swipes-hillarys-inevitability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article, I think, highlights the largest problem facing the Hillary Clinton campaign right now: she doesn&#8217;t want to let go of what she considers to be &#8220;her turn.&#8221;  When Hillary Clinton announced that she was running for president, it was widely speculated that she would be the candidate to win the primary vote. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080301/D8V4LA080.html">This article</a>, I think, highlights the largest problem facing the Hillary Clinton campaign right now: she doesn&#8217;t want to let go of what she considers to be &#8220;her turn.&#8221;  When Hillary Clinton <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/20/clinton.announcement/index.html">announced that she was running for president</a>, it was widely speculated that she would be the candidate to win the primary vote.  Really, no one could have imagined that a relatively new Senator could have possibly given her a run for her money.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, and to Hillary Clinton&#8217;s great regret, those pundits were wrong.  And now she finds herself in a <a href="http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/world/view/20080301-122250/Obama-Clinton-deadlocked-in-Texas-Ohio--poll">neck and neck race</a> so drawn out, so intense, and most of all so unpredictable, that her campaign is finding it hard handling the heat.<!--adsense--></p>
<p>Her campaign has struggled greatly with its own identity.  While Barack Obama has built his campaign around the concepts of hope, idealism, and ending a war that never should have been waged, Hillary has not yet found her niche.  At first, she was experienced.  Then, she wanted change too.  Now, she&#8217;s a freedom fighter, sob story, whiner, preacher of sarcasm, and burster of hopebubbles.  After all that her campaign has been through, they still can&#8217;t get away from the central theme of <em>&#8220;I am Hillary, hear me roar.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>In the end, it all boils down to her disappointment at her stolen inevitability.  Hillary Clinton believed that it was her turn.  That no one would stop her in a race for the White House, and that she would be able to go back to that hallowed home and once again take up the seat of power (with Bill, of course).  They are a family of politics, one that has been through its ups and downs, but has never let go of their big goal: to spend as much time in seats of power as possible.  And now, that dream is at risk.</p>
<p>This, perhaps, has been the greatest contrast between the two candidates.  On the one hand, you have Barack Obama, champion of the people, hopemonger, dreamer, a man with a dream that encompasses the entire nation.  On the other, you have Hillary Clinton, multi-faced, champion of the Clinton, and a woman with a dream that encompasses her and Bill, and damned be anyone who stands in her way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/barack-obama-swipes-hillarys-inevitability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/barack-obama-swipes-hillarys-inevitability/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton Chooses Money over Integrity</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/kriticle/~3/243899659/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillary-clinton-chooses-money-over-integrity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Kriticle</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics 2008]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>imagine</category>
	<category>a</category>
	<category>moment</category>
	<category>a</category>
	<category>company</category>
	<category>a</category>
	<category>disbarred</category>
	<category>lawyer</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillary-clinton-chooses-money-over-integrity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine for a moment a company with a disbarred lawyer as the CEO, one who has a criminal record.  Add to that the fact that the federal government is accusing this company, International Profit Associates (IPA), of sexual assault, innuendo, and anti-female language, with claims from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) of 103 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine for a moment a company with a disbarred lawyer as the CEO, one who has a criminal record.  Add to that the fact that the federal government is accusing this company, International Profit Associates (IPA), of sexual assault, innuendo, and anti-female language, with claims from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) of 103 female victims.</p>
<p>Now imagine you are Hillary Clinton, and you have just received $170,000 in donations from such a company.  <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/29/718538.aspx">Would you take it?</a><!--adsense--></p>
<p>Apparently for Hillary Clinton, the answer is yes.  This is yet another case of greed over integrity, and a complete lack of proper judgment on the part of  Hillary Clinton&#8217;s campaign.  Yes, the case the EEOC calls one of the worst it has ever seen is still ongoing, with IPA furiously denying any of its 103 allegations, but it is still a company with very shady dealings.  How can Hillary Clinton continue to smear the Barack Obama campaign with unsubstantiated attacks while she rakes in not just endorsements, but MONEY from contributors such as this?</p>
<p>The answer is simple: desperation.  Why else would she accept money from a company accused of horrible behavior against women now, when <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20713395/">she would not accept Norman Hsu&#8217;s donations</a> due to allegations alone?  Hillary knows she is on a downhill slope, with supporters dropping off every day.  <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/make-that-11-for-obama/">Eleven straight victories</a> by Barack Obama have helped, as well as several smear attempts by Hillary Clinton <a href="http://www.kriticle.com/politics/official-barack-obama-answer-to-hillarys-scare-tactics/">backfiring</a>.  Then again, there&#8217;s also the many faces of Hillary, where she decided to try <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23343962/">a kitchen sink tactic</a> and act like five different candidates in just five days.  Now, the only question is, when will she face the music and step down, allowing the Democratic party to begin the real fight of the year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillary-clinton-chooses-money-over-integrity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/hillary-clinton-chooses-money-over-integrity/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Official Barack Obama Answer to Hillary’s Scare Tactics</title>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/kriticle/~3/243616306/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/official-barack-obama-answer-to-hillarys-scare-tactics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Kriticle</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics 2008]]></category>

	<!-- AutoMeta Start -->
	<category>the</category>
	<category>official</category>
	<category>barack</category>
	<category>obama</category>
	<category>answer</category>
	<category />
	<category>post</category>
	<category>2</category>
	<category>updates</category>
	<category>post</category>
	<category>3</category>
	<category>updates</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>expansive</category>
	<category>issues</category>
	<category>and</category>
	<category>close</category>
	<category>the</category>
	<category>issue</category>
	<category>kriticle com</category>
	<category>posted</category>
	<!-- AutoMeta End -->
	
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kriticle.com/politics/official-barack-obama-answer-to-hillarys-scare-tactics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has been one of the most expansive issues I have seen in a while.  On Kriticle.com we&#8217;ve posted one post with 3 updates, another post with 2 updates, and now we close the issue with this, the official Barack Obama answer.  All I have to say is that he definitely knows how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been one of the most expansive issues I have seen in a while.  On Kriticle.com we&#8217;ve posted one post with 3 updates, another post with 2 updates, and now we close the issue with this, the official Barack Obama answer.  All I have to say is that he definitely knows how to hire the right people and still not run out of campaign money.  Barack Obama&#8217;s response ad answers the original scare attempt perfectly and, as usual, allows Barack Obama to come out the better candidate.</p>
<p>Hillary should learn, every smear she attempts to perform only ends up making Barack Obama look better.</p>
<p><center><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/879o1_pxO0c&amp;rel=1&amp;border=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/879o1_pxO0c&amp;rel=1&amp;border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object></center></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong>  I should have known there was no way I could post this and leave well enough alone.  As always, there&#8217;s another update to the story.  This time, it has to do with McCain!  It seems that Hillary Clinton isn&#8217;t the only one who anticipates answering the phone at 3AM.  It also appears that Hillary&#8217;s campaign copied her scare tactic ad from an ad made by John McCain&#8217;s supporters!</p>
<p><center><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GPadP7eAO9Y&amp;rel=1&amp;border=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GPadP7eAO9Y&amp;rel=1&amp;border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/official-barack-obama-answer-to-hillarys-scare-tactics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.kriticle.com/politics/official-barack-obama-answer-to-hillarys-scare-tactics/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
